AGENDA MEMORANDUM. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. Bryan Cobb, City Manager FROM: DATE: September 21, 2015

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "AGENDA MEMORANDUM. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members. Bryan Cobb, City Manager FROM: DATE: September 21, 2015"

Transcription

1 AGENDA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Bryan Cobb, City Manager DATE: SUBJECT: Resolution No , Site Development Order No : Shoppes at Oviedo on the Park (Park Place Apartments of Oviedo, LLC) Procedure: Call Up Item City Manager Background Applicant Presentation Public Comment - Request to Speak Forms submitted prior to beginning of meeting. Council Motion & Discussion Council Action Introduction: This is a request for the City Council to approve Site Development Order No , Shoppes at Oviedo on the Park OOTP) development. The proposed development is located on the northeast intersection of Mitchell Hammock Road and City Plaza Way. The total land area is two point one six (2.16) acres. The property owner is Park Place Apartments of Oviedo, LLC, represented by Mr. Tom Cavanaugh. The property developer is Morse Property Real Estate and Development LLC. The Consultant is Klima Weeks Civil Engineering. Discussion: The subject property s future land use designation is Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) and its zoning district is Mixed Use District-New Downtown Village Core (MUD-VC). The proposed development is located within the Oviedo on the Park Master Plan. Per LDC Section 6.4(F)(3)(a), the Land Use Administrator shall issue site development orders and permits for permissible uses within the New Downtown Village Core District. On May 5, 2014, City Council adopted Resolution No , providing through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), that the City Council will act as the Land Use Administrator with regard to lands assigned the New Downtown Village Core and New Downtown Zoning Districts and subject to the Oviedo on the Park Master Plan. The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning district for the property. The Applicant proposes to subdivide the land into three (3) lots and one Tract. Lot 1 is 0.37 acres in size and will contain a 2,118 square foot coffee shop with drive through. Lot 2 has an area of 0.72 acres and will encompass restaurant and retail uses. Lot 3 is 0.99 acres in size and will be developed later with a use yet to be determined. Tract A is 0.07 acres in size and will

2 Page 2 comprise landscape, entry, sidewalk and maintenance easements. On-site parking is provided in the interior of the lots. There will be a total of forty-nine (49) on-site parking spaces within Lots 1 and 2. The development will have one (1) vehicular access on its north side, from the Mike Roberto Way right-of-way. Concurrency requirements have been satisfied. Potable water and sewer service will be provided by the City of Oviedo. Solid waste capacity is available through Seminole County. Drainage is linked to the overall drainage system of the Oviedo on the Park development. The Applicant requests the following deviations to the Land Development Code minimum standards. The Applicant s justifications are shown in italics. Staff s recommendations are shown in underline. Mitigation for the deviation requests are also addressed by Staff. 1) LDC Section 6.4(L)(6)(d)(i), Buffers for Off-street Surface Parking: A five (5) foot deviation to the requirement of a minimum ten (10) foot buffer width for off-street surface parking, to allow the north buffer adjacent to Mike Roberto Way to be five (5) feet in width along the segment starting at the southeast intersection of City Plaza Way and Mike Roberto Way and running east for a distance of two hundred and sixty seven (267) feet (50% deviation). This deviation is requested in order to increase the effective Mitchell Hammock Road buffer yard from 10 feet (required) to 20 feet (provided). Staff concurs with this deviation as it compensates the lost width on the north buffer yard along Mike Roberto Way, adding width to the south buffer yard along Mitchell Hammock Road, whose speed (45 miles/hour) and width (100 feet) justifies a wider buffer. 2) LDC Section 6.4(L)(6)(d)(ii), Buffers for Off-street Surface Parking: A deviation to the requirement of installation of seven (7) canopy trees along approximately two hundred and tree (203) feet of the west buffer yard adjacent to City Plaza Way, to allow the installation of one (1) canopy tree (86% deviation). The planting area is limited by the required screen wall and benches for the drive-through buffer, which was provided to enhance and preserve the pedestrian oriented character of the Oviedo on the Park area. Trees would conflict with the wall, wall foundation and trellis. Instead, a hedge was provided to soften the wall foundation and 4 understory trees frame the wall. Staff concurs with this deviation as it screens the drive through building with an opaque wall and adds understory trees to the buffer yard, minimizing the loss of canopy trees. 3) LDC Section 6.4(L)(6)(d)(ii), Buffers for Off-street Surface Parking: A deviation to the requirement of installation of eight (8) canopy trees along approximately two hundred and six (206) feet of the north buffer yard adjacent to Mike Roberto Way, to allow the installation of five (5) canopy trees (37% deviation).

3 Page 3 Deviation was requested by master developer s landscape architect due to limited soils space in drive-through area. Additional understory trees were added to compensate for reduction in canopy trees. To reduce the amount of the deviation and to provide more screening and shade along Mike Roberto Way, Staff recommends that one of the proposed understory trees be replaced with an additional canopy tree planted on the west side of the site s car entrance. The landscape strip is the same width as the one on the east side of the car entrance which shows three (3) canopy trees being planted. This will reduce the deviation to 25%. Staff also recommends that the provided five (5) understory trees be counted as mitigation for the missing canopy trees, on a basis of 2 understory trees = 1 canopy tree, thus exempting the Applicant from the payment into the tree bank. The reduction of the deviation has already been included in the SDO and Resolution No ) LDC Section 6.4(L)(6)(f)(ii), Required Buffer from Mitchell Hammock Road: A deviation to the requirement of installation of five (5) canopy trees along approximately one hundred and sixty four (164) feet of the south buffer yard adjacent to Mitchell Hammock Road, to allow the installation of four (4) canopy trees (20% deviation). Deviation was requested by master developer to open up view lines to the master sign at the southeast corner of Mitchell Hammock Road and City Plaza Way. Staff recommends that the Applicant pay into the City s tree bank an amount equivalent to the cost of installation of missing canopy trees as mitigation for this deviation. 5) LDC Section 6.4(L)(6)(f)(ii), Required Buffer from Mitchell Hammock Road: A deviation to the requirement of installation of five (5) understory trees along approximately one hundred and sixty four (164) feet of the south buffer yard adjacent to Mitchell Hammock Road, to allow the installation of four (4) understory trees (20% deviation). Deviation is requested for health of trees as they reach maturity. There is not sufficient space for both street trees and buffer yard trees. The mature spread of a southern live oak (provided buffer yard trees) is feet, and the trees and the trees are spaced roughly 30 feet on center in the provided landscape plan. The soil area of the southern live oak is roughly 30 x30. The space between the front of walk and the Mitchell Hammock Road back of curb is approximately 22 feet, therefore the proposed tree spacing and available root space is correct for the trees as provided on the landscape plan. Staff recommends that the Applicant pay into the City s tree bank an amount equivalent to the cost of installation of the missing understory trees as mitigation for this deviation. 6) LDC Section 6.4(L)(7)(c)(ii), Vehicular Use Area Landscaping, Interior Islands: A four (4) foot deviation to the requirement that interior parking islands measure a minimum of eight (8) feet in width, to allow the interior parking island located adjacent to Mitchell Hammock

4 Page 4 Road and fronting the restaurant/retail building entrance to be four (4) feet in width (50% deviation). Deviation requested to provide a concrete pedestrian access from Mitchell Hammock Road to the restaurant/retail building. Staff concurs with this deviation as it provides a safe access to pedestrians directly from Mitchell Hammock Road. 7) LDC Section 6.4(L)(5)9a)(i), Street Trees Requirements: A deviation to the requirement of the installation of six (6) canopy street trees along approximately two hundred and forty-two (242) feet of Mitchell Hammock Road public right-of-way, to allow the installation of zero (0) canopy street trees (100% deviation). Deviation is requested for health of trees as they reach maturity. There is not sufficient space for both street trees and buffer yard trees. The mature spread of a southern live oak (provided buffer yard trees) is feet and the trees and the trees are spaced roughly 30 feet on center in the provided landscape plan. The soil area of the southern live oak is roughly 30 x30. The space between the front of walk and the Mitchell Hammock back of curb is approximately 22 feet, therefore the proposed tree spacing and available root space is correct for the trees as provided on the landscape plan. Per this LDC section, street trees are to be planted in medians of streets. In the case of Mitchell Hammock Road, despite having a median, the existence of a power utility easement on the entirety of the road makes it difficult to install trees on its medians. Therefore, Staff recommends that the Applicant pay into the City s tree bank an amount equivalent to the cost of 6 canopy trees as mitigation for this deviation. 8) LDC Section 6.4(L)(5)(a)(iii), Street Trees Requirements: A deviation to the requirement of installation of seven (7) street understory trees along approximately two hundred and fortytwo (242) feet of Mitchell Hammock public right-of-way, to allow the installation of zero (0) street understory trees (100% deviation). Deviation is requested for health of trees as they reach maturity. There is not sufficient space for both street trees and buffer yard trees. The mature spread of a southern live oak (provided buffer yard trees) is feet and the trees and the trees are spaced roughly 30 feet on center in the provided landscape plan. The soil area of the southern live oak is roughly 30 x30. The space between the front of walk and the Mitchell Hammock back of curb is approximately 22 feet, therefore the proposed tree spacing and available root space is correct for the trees as provided on the landscape plan. Street understory trees are a requirement of this LDC section. Therefore Staff recommends that the Applicant pay into the City s tree bank an amount equivalent to the cost of installation of 7 understory trees as mitigation for this deviation.

5 Page 5 The recommended payment into the tree bank is listed as one of the Condition of Approval No. 10 of SDO No The Applicant also requests deviations to the Land Development Code s architectural standards for the proposed buildings. All of the deviation requests regarding architecture of the buildings relate to the fact that the architecture standards for the Mixed Use Downtown-Village Core zoning district were not designed for drive-through or single uses. Staff worked with the Applicant to propose architectural features to the coffee shop with drive through building and to the retail/restaurant building that can mitigate the drive through lane along City Plaza Way and the lay-out of standalone buildings surrounded by a parking lot on the site. The goals were to: 1) Obtain an architecture proposal that was unique and could later be identified with the Oviedo on the Park neighborhood; and 2) Mitigate the drive-through character of the proposed coffee shop site by dressing up the drive-through façade with additional architectural elements. The features to attain these goals are listed below. Coffee Shop with drive-through Building: 1. Staff requested that a wall be placed along the drive-through lane facing City Plaza Way. The function of the wall is two-fold: cover the drive-through lane itself and provide an attractive building edge along City Plaza Way, aligned with the pedestrian character planned for Oviedo on the Park. 2. The proposed wall is planned to have different texture elements and associated decorative features. The wall is finished in brick and tile, has pillars and beams in bronze anodized aluminum, two (2) benches, planters and a decorative feature on its center replacing the originally proposed water feature. 3. The wall beams will be attached to the western façade of the building so that it can be treated as part of the building façade. 4. The western building façade has additional wall murals proposed in order to avoid having blank walls. Due to the internal lay-out of the Starbucks store, that portion of the building cannot support real windows. 5. The same façade treatment is proposed to all building facades. The façade finishes combine a mixture of brick, siding and stucco in minor areas. 6. The colors proposed are in line with Oviedo on the Park colors. 7. The main entrance was accentuated with additional brick coverage. 8. Additional architectural features are also provided, such as roof modulation, canopies along the entrances and shutters along the eastern façade. Restaurant/retail Building: 1. The same architecture character of the coffee shop with drive-through building is proposed to the restaurant/retail building in the site. 2. The same façade treatment is proposed to all building facades and the façade finishes combine a mixture of brick, siding and stucco in minor areas. Staff concludes that the proposed plans address the main concerns of having a drive-through lane facing City Plaza Way and recommends approval of the following deviations:

6 Page 6 Coffee Shop with Drive-through Building: 9) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(g)(ii), General Façade Standards: A twelve (12) foot deviation to the requirement that the maximum distance between two (2) windows or a window and any corner or edge of a façade shall be fifteen (15) feet, to allow the distance between one (1) window of the East façade of the subject building to be twenty seven (27) feet to the corner of the building (80% deviation). 10) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(g)(ii), General Façade Standards: A one point three (1.3) foot deviation to the requirement that the maximum distance between two (2) windows or a window and any corner or edge of a façade shall be fifteen (15) feet, to allow the distance between two (2) windows of the West façade facing City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way) of the subject building to be sixteen point three (16.3) feet (8.6% deviation). 11) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(g)(iii)(1), General Façade Standards: A fifty five point nine (55.9) square feet deviation to the requirement that if the height of a façade exceeds eighteen (18) feet, then at least ten (10) percent of the entire façade shall be windows. The North façade (facing Mike Roberto Way) of the subject building contains 601 square feet, with ten percent (10%) of that being 60.1 square feet, and we are providing a 4.2 square foot window at the Drive-Thru, as this is their back-of-house & storage within the building, and only a service door is provided (93% deviation). 12) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(i), Street Level Façade Standards: Sixty percent (60%) of the street level area of the West Façade fronting City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way) is square feet. Only square feet, or twenty-nine percent (29%), of the square feet of the required street level windows of the West Façade of the subject building fronting City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way) will be windows. Deviation requested: A six hundred five point six (605.6) square foot deviation to the minimum requirement that at least 60% (856.2 square feet) of the West Façade of the subject building fronting City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way) shall be windows, to allow only square feet, of the required street level windows of the West Façade of the subject building fronting City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way) to be windows (71% deviation). 13) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(i), Street Level Façade Standards: Sixty percent (60%) of the street level area of the South Façade fronting Mitchell Hammock Road is square feet. Only square feet, or thirty-three percent (33%), of the square feet of the required street level windows of the South Façade of the subject building fronting Mitchell Hammock Road will be windows. Deviation requested: A two hundred sixty-six point three (266.3) square foot deviation to the minimum requirement that at least 60% (399.6 square feet) of the South Façade of the subject building shall be windows, to allow only square feet, of the required street level windows of the South Façade of the subject building fronting Mitchell Hammock Road to be windows (67% deviation). 14) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(i), Street Level Façade Standards: Sixty percent (60%) of the street level of the North Façade fronting Mike Roberto Way is square feet. Only 4.2 square feet, or zero point three percent (0.3%), of the square feet of the required street level

7 Page 7 windows of the North Façade of the subject building fronting Mike Roberto Way will be windows. Deviation requested: A three hundred fifty-six point four (356.4) square foot deviation to the minimum requirement that at least 60% (360.6 square feet) of the North Façade of the subject building shall be windows, to allow only 4.2 square feet of the required street level windows of the North Façade of the subject building fronting Mitchell Hammock Road to be windows (99% deviation). 15) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(i), Street Level Façade Standards: Sixty percent (60%) of the street level of the East Façade fronting the site interior is 882 square feet. Only square feet, or thirty-seven percent (37%), of the 882 square feet of the required street level windows of the East Façade of the subject building will be windows. Deviation requested: A five hundred fifty-two point four (552.4) square foot deviation to the minimum requirement that at least 60% (882 square feet) of the East Façade of the subject building shall be windows, to allow only square feet of the required street level windows of the East Façade of the subject building fronting the site interior to be windows (63% deviation). 16) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(ii), Street Level Façade Standards: Fifty percent (50%) of the street level windows shall be transparent, at the West Façade fronting City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way), with fifty percent (50%) being square feet. The West Façade has only 92 square feet, or seventy-three percent (73%), of the square feet of the required Transparent street level windows. Deviation requested: A thirty-three point three (33.3) square foot deviation to the minimum requirement that at least 50% (125.3 square feet) of the West Façade of the subject building shall be transparent windows, to allow only 92 square feet of the required street level windows be transparent at the West Façade of the subject building fronting City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way) (27% deviation). 17) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(iii), Street Level Façade Standards: The West Façade fronting City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way) is 77.5 feet in length. Only 20.8 feet, or twenty-seven percent (27%), of the 77.5 feet of the required street level frontage of the West Façade of the subject building fronting City Plaza Way (LDC former Oviedo Way) will be 4-foot deep awnings. Deviation requested: A fifty-six point seven (56.7) foot deviation to the minimum requirement that the entire frontage (77.5 feet) of the West Façade of the subject building fronting City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way) shall have an arcade, awning or other weatherproof cover of at least four (4) feet in depth along its entire frontage, to allow only 20.8 feet of the 77.5 feet of the required street level frontage of the West Façade of the subject building fronting City Plaza Way (LDC Oviedo Way) to be 4-foot deep awnings (73% deviation). Retail/Restaurant Building: 18) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(g)(iii)(1), General Façade Standards: A one hundred sixty-one point six (161.6) square feet deviation to the requirement that if the height of a façade exceeds eighteen (18) feet, then at least ten (10) percent of the entire façade shall be windows. The North façade facing Mike Roberto Way of the subject building contains 1,616 square feet, with ten percent (10%) of that being square feet, and we are providing No windows at

8 Page 8 the North Façade facing Mike Roberto Way, as this is their back-of-house & storage within the building, and only five (5) service doors are provided (100% deviation). 19) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(i), Street Level Façade Standards: Sixty percent (60%) of the street level area of the West Façade fronting the site interior is square feet. Only square feet, or thirty-three percent (33%), of the square feet of the required street level windows of the West Façade of the subject building fronting the site interior will be windows. Deviation requested: A five hundred thirty-six point two (536.2) square foot deviation to the minimum requirement that at least 60% (795.6 square feet) of the West Façade of the subject building fronting the site interior shall be windows, to allow only square feet, of the required street level windows of the West Façade of the subject building fronting the site interior to be windows (48% deviation). 20) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(i), Street Level Façade Standards: Sixty percent (60%) of the street level area of the South Façade fronting Mitchell Hammock Road is 1,039.2 square feet. Only square feet, or forty-six percent (46%), of the 1,039.2 square feet of the required street level windows of the South Façade of the subject building fronting Mitchell Hammock Road will be windows. Deviation requested: A five hundred sixty-two point eight (562.8) square foot deviation to the minimum requirement that at least 60% (1,039.2 square feet) of the South Façade of the subject building shall be windows, to allow only square feet, of the required street level windows of the South Façade of the subject building fronting Mitchell Hammock Road to be windows (54% deviation). 21) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(i), Street Level Façade Standards: Sixty percent (60%) of the street level of the North Façade fronting Mike Roberto Way is square feet. There are No Windows, or zero percent (0.0%), of the square feet of the required street level windows at the North Façade of the subject building fronting Mike Roberto Way. Deviation requested: A nine hundred sixty-nine point six (969.6) square foot deviation to the minimum requirement that at least 60% (969.4 square feet) of the North Façade of the subject building shall be No windows (100% deviation). 22) LDC Section 6.4(F)(4)(h)(i), Street Level Façade Standards: Sixty percent (60%) of the street level area of the East Façade fronting the site interior is square feet. Only square feet, or thirty-three percent (33%), of the square feet of the required street level windows of the East Façade of the subject building fronting the site interior will be windows. Deviation requested: A five hundred thirty-six point two (536.2) square foot deviation to the minimum requirement that at least 60% (795.6 square feet) of the East Façade of the subject building fronting the site interior shall be windows, to allow only square feet, of the required street level windows of the East Façade of the subject building fronting the site interior to be windows (48% deviation). Budget Impact: There is no impact to the budget as a result of the proposed Site Development Order. Strategic Impact: The proposed development of Shoppes at Oviedo on the Park is consistent with the Economic and Vitality goal.

9 Page 9 Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution No Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Colored Elevations Coffee Shop with drive-through Building 3. Colored Elevations Retail/Restaurant Building 4. City Attorney s Advice on Project Denials Prepared by: Genoveva Fruet, Development Review Manager Reviewed by: Teresa Correa, Development Services Director

DT Downtown. a) Intent. The "downtown (DT) district" is designed for the commercial core of Lake Worth, primarily along Lake and Lucerne Avenues from

DT Downtown. a) Intent. The downtown (DT) district is designed for the commercial core of Lake Worth, primarily along Lake and Lucerne Avenues from DT Downtown. a) Intent. The "downtown (DT) district" is designed for the commercial core of Lake Worth, primarily along Lake and Lucerne Avenues from Golfview to the Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-way.

More information

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS Chapter 20.14 Sections: 20.14.010 Purpose of the Downtown Zoning Districts 20.14.020 Land Use Regulations for Downtown Zoning Districts 20.14.030 Development Standards for Downtown Zoning Districts 20.14.010

More information

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 06-05 A ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA; APPROVING A REQUEST BY NAPITA HOLDINGS, LLC IN REFERENCE TO BONITA ROAD LOCKUP CPD; TO REZONE

More information

Lacey UGA Residential density

Lacey UGA Residential density Thurston County Planning Department BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS Residential density amendment to Title 21 Title 21 6/1/2012 Lacey UGA

More information

Sedro woolley, WA 720 MURDOCK ST. FOR sale. 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0.

Sedro woolley, WA 720 MURDOCK ST. FOR sale. 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0. 720 MURDOCK ST Sedro woolley, WA FOR sale 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0.27 +/- AC Former City Hall built in 1930 Located in the Downtown Sedro Woolley core

More information

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: October 23, Item No. F-1. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: October 23, Item No. F-1. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I M E M O R A N D U M Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 Item No. F-1 To: From: Subject: Planning and Zoning Commission Daniel Turner, Planner I PUBLIC HEARING: Consider a recommendation of a of Planned Development

More information

Exhibit D. Tallow Ridge PUD. Written Description. Date: January 5, E. City Development Number:

Exhibit D. Tallow Ridge PUD. Written Description. Date: January 5, E. City Development Number: Exhibit D Tallow Ridge PUD Written Description Date: January 5, 2016 I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY A. Current Land Use Designation: RR B. Current Zoning District: PUD C. Requested Zoning District:

More information

No principal structure shall be located any closer to any. street or property line than the required minimum setback as

No principal structure shall be located any closer to any. street or property line than the required minimum setback as ARTICLE V Yard and Setback Regulations 1. General requirements. No principal structure shall be located any closer to any street or property line than the required minimum setback as set forth in Article

More information

Anacortes, WA. 718 commercial ave. FOR lease. 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building. Located in historic downtown Anacortes

Anacortes, WA. 718 commercial ave. FOR lease. 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building. Located in historic downtown Anacortes 718 commercial ave Anacortes, WA FOR lease 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building Located in historic downtown Anacortes Frontage on Commercial Ave alongside four other retail spaces Zoned

More information

ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS

ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS Section 23.01 Intent. The intent of this Article is to provide regulatory standards for condominiums and site condominiums similar to those required for projects developed

More information

ARTICLE XVII SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

ARTICLE XVII SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS ARTICLE XVII SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS SECTION 1700. LIMITING HEIGHT, BULK, DENSITY, AND AREA BY DISTRICT TYPE Use Minimum Size Lot Per Unit Maximum Height of Structures Minimum Yard Setback (Per Lot in

More information

Article 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements

Article 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements Article 7: Residential Land Use and Section 701: Statement of Intent (A) (B) (C) The intent of Article 7 is to develop certain land use and development requirements for the residential uses within Cumru

More information

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Composition of traditional residential corridors. Page 1 of 7 St. Petersburg, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - ST. PETERSBURG CITY CODE >> Chapter 16 - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS >> SECTION 16.20.060. CORRIDOR RESIDENTIAL TRADITIONAL DISTRICTS

More information

Chapter Plat Design (LMC)

Chapter Plat Design (LMC) Chapter 18.14 Plat Design (LMC) Sections: 18.14.010 Lot width 18.14.020 Right-of-way requirements 18.14.030 Pipe stem lots 18.14.040 Division resulting in minimum lot sizes 18.14.050 Flood prone and bad

More information

SECTION 822 "R-1-A" AND "R-1-AH" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

SECTION 822 R-1-A AND R-1-AH - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SECTION 822 "R-1-A" AND "R-1-AH" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The "R-1-A" and "R-1-AH" Districts are intended to provide for the development of single family residential homes at urban standards

More information

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR 4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE PROJECTS This chapter presents standards for residential mixed-use projects in the Ashland-Cherryland Business District and the Castro Valley Central Business

More information

ARTICLE VII-A - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R-2 FH 9. be for one or more of the following uses:

ARTICLE VII-A - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R-2 FH 9. be for one or more of the following uses: ARTICLE VII-A - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R-2 FH 9 7-1A USE REGULATIONS In Residential District R-2 F, structures to be erected or land to be used shall be for one or more of the following uses: 7-1.1A Single-family

More information

a. To insure compatible relationships between land use activities;

a. To insure compatible relationships between land use activities; PART B SECTION VIII INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICTS Article 1 Planned Institutional District 1. Purpose and Intent: It is the purpose and intent of this district to permit and encourage the orderly, cooperative

More information

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement Cover Letter with Narrative Statement March 31, 2017 rev July 27, 2017 RE: Rushton Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development Application for Public Hearing for RPUD Rezone PL2015 000 0306 Mr. Eric Johnson,

More information

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation June 29, 2017

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation June 29, 2017 Rezoning Petition 2017-076 Zoning Committee Recommendation June 29, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: MUDD-O (mixed use development, optional) and R-4 (single family residential) Proposed Zoning: UR-2(CD) (urban

More information

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES Development Services Department Planning and Permitting Adopted August 15, 2005 SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME GUIDELINES A. Purpose and Applicability.

More information

ARTICLE III: LAND USE DISTRICTS 304 R 9 DISTRICT

ARTICLE III: LAND USE DISTRICTS 304 R 9 DISTRICT ARTICLE III: LAND USE DISTRICTS III 23 304 R 9 DISTRICT (RESIDENTIAL 9 UNITS PER ACRE) 304 1 Intent and Purpose The R 9 District is intended to implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for areas

More information

Chapter 12 RMH MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE

Chapter 12 RMH MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE Chapter 12 RMH MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE 10-12-1: DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: 10-12-2: PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES: 10-12-3: BUILDINGS AND USES PERMITTED CONDITIONALLY: 10-12-4: STRUCTURAL

More information

ML-4 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE. [Added by Ord. No ]

ML-4 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE. [Added by Ord. No ] 55-26. ML-4 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE. [Added 2-2-98 by Ord. No. 1998-1 2] The following regulations apply in the ML-4 Zone. A. Permitted Uses. (1) Garden apartments, together with accessory structures

More information

ARTICLE VII - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R-2. be for one or more of the following uses:

ARTICLE VII - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R-2. be for one or more of the following uses: ARTICLE VII - RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R-2 7-1 USE REGULATIONS In Residential District R-2, structures to be erected or land to be used shall be for one or more of the following uses: 7-1.1 Single-family dwellings.

More information

South Portland City Council Position Paper of the City Manager

South Portland City Council Position Paper of the City Manager Agenda Item #16 Meeting of May 4, 2015 South Portland City Council Position Paper of the City Manager Subject: ORDINANCE #12-14/15 Amending Chapter 27, Zoning, regarding a zone change from Residential

More information

II. What Type of Development Requires Site Plan Review? There are five situations where a site plan review is required:

II. What Type of Development Requires Site Plan Review? There are five situations where a site plan review is required: I. What is a Site Plan Review? Site Plan Review is a process where the construction of new buildings, new additions, and certain types of canopies and/or tax-exempt institutions are reviewed by the City

More information

MEMORANDUM. DATE: August 31, Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator. Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner

MEMORANDUM. DATE: August 31, Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator. Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner NEW BUSINESS 8B MEMORANDUM DATE: August 31, 2015 TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-016 Applicant:

More information

Committed to Service. License Agreement Application Form

Committed to Service. License Agreement Application Form Committed to Service License Agreement Application Form PLEASE NOTE: Effective February 16, 2010 - License Agreements within the downtown Boise area for public structures, objects and uses on ACHD sidewalks

More information

ARTICLE V AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

ARTICLE V AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ARTICLE V AP AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 500. PURPOSE It is the purpose of the AP, Agricultural Preservation and Rural Residential District, to foster the preservation

More information

ARTICLE 9 GENOA TOWN CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT

ARTICLE 9 GENOA TOWN CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT Sec. 9.01 PURPOSE GENOA TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE 9 GENOA TOWN CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT 9.01.01 The Genoa Town Center Overlay District is provided specifically for the development or redevelopment

More information

MEMORANDUM. DATE: November 9, 2016 PC Agenda Item 3.C

MEMORANDUM. DATE: November 9, 2016 PC Agenda Item 3.C MEMORANDUM DATE: November 9, 2016 PC Agenda Item 3.C TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Eric Zweber, AICP, Interim City Planner Planning Case #16-029 Public Hearing Required Applicant: Bremer Bank,

More information

The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:

The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District: "R-E" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT (8/06) The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District: 1. Uses Permitted: The following uses are permitted. A Zoning Certificate may be required as provided

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017 AGENDA ITEM #22 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017 COUNCIL AGENDA SUBJECT: Discuss and consider the Second Reading of an Ordinance regarding 16-OR-006a amending the Leander Code of Ordinances, Chapter 14, Zoning,

More information

SECTION 827 "R-2" AND "R-2-A" - LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

SECTION 827 R-2 AND R-2-A - LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SECTION 827 "R-2" AND "R-2-A" - LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The "R-2" and "R-2-A" Districts are intended to provide for the development of low density multiple family residential

More information

MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter "Agreement") made and entered into this day of, 2007, pursuant to Section 205-30 of the Zoning Ordinances of the City of

More information

STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ON 8 th STREET

STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ON 8 th STREET STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ON 8 th STREET ADOPTED BY THE CCDC BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ORIGINAL ADOPTION: APRIL 10, 2006 REVISION: AUGUST 12, 2013 Introduction CCDC owns the 8 th Street right-of-way

More information

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 This Chapter presents the development standards for residential projects. Section 2.1 discusses

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014 DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION McGowin Park, LLC PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East) 1401 Satchel Paige Drive

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item PDP-13-00518 Item No. 3B- 1 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item PC Staff Report 2/24/14 ITEM NO. 3B PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HERE @ KANSAS; 1101 INDIANA ST (SLD) PDP-13-00518:

More information

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR February 19, 2019 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board LDC2018-10020 Item #11 S U M M A R Y Applicant The City of Orlando ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR Applicant s Request Update

More information

RESOLUTION TO FORM THE REDSTONE PARKWAY BENEFIT DISTRICT

RESOLUTION TO FORM THE REDSTONE PARKWAY BENEFIT DISTRICT Agenda Item No. 8A November 10, 2015 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager Steven L. Hartwig, Director of Public Works/City Engineer RESOLUTION TO FORM

More information

Sec. 3-1 Single Family R- Use Districts.

Sec. 3-1 Single Family R- Use Districts. Section - R-Use Districts 0 0 Sec. - Single Family R- Use Districts. A. Purpose and applicability. Single-Family Districts are intended to accommodate low density, single-family dwelling units with adequate

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 41. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE As Amended Through April 10, 2008

ORDINANCE NO. 41. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE As Amended Through April 10, 2008 ORDINANCE NO. 41 PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE As Amended Through April 10, 2008 An Ordinance to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the inhabitants of Port Sheldon Township. The Township of Port

More information

RO-1 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT

RO-1 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT 6.12 - RO-1 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT 6.12.1 PERMITTED USES: Within the RO-1 High Density Residential- Professional Office District the following uses are permitted: 6.12.1.1

More information

KASSON TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO (EFFECTIVE: MAY 12, 2007)

KASSON TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO (EFFECTIVE: MAY 12, 2007) KASSON TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 2007-01 (EFFECTIVE: MAY 12, 2007) An ordinance providing for the standards and specifications incident to the development of Private Motor Vehicle

More information

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 SECTION 10.5A10 GENERAL... 1 10.5A11 Purpose and Intent... 1 10.5A12 Applicability... 1 10.5A13 Compliance with Regulating Plan... 1 10.5A14 Relationship

More information

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No. 10-2014 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG, SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY TO ADOPT A FORM BASED CODE AS AN OVERLAY DISTRICT AFFECTING PORTIONS OF THE B-1 AND R-1 ZONING

More information

M E M O R A N D U M. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I

M E M O R A N D U M. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I M E M O R A N D U M Meeting Date: Monday, April 10, 2017 Item No. F-4 To: From: Planning and Zoning Commission Daniel Turner, Planner I Subject: Consider a recommendation of a Preliminary Site Evaluation

More information

This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of medium density, high rise multiple family housing.

This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of medium density, high rise multiple family housing. PART XXVI - RM-3 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ZONE THREE PART XXVI - RM-3 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ZONE THREE A. INTENT This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of medium density, high rise

More information

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059 Attachment 2 BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059 WHEREAS Section 639 of the Municipal Government Act requires every municipality

More information

Flatbush Rezoning and Text Amendments LR Item 3: Description of Proposal

Flatbush Rezoning and Text Amendments LR Item 3: Description of Proposal Project Description The New York City Department of City Planning (DCP), at the request of Community Board 14, elected officials and civic groups, proposes zoning map changes and zoning text amendments

More information

MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. CASE NUMBER: P.D L.U.C.B. MEETING: August 14, 2008

MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. CASE NUMBER: P.D L.U.C.B. MEETING: August 14, 2008 MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT 17 CASE NUMBER: P.D. 08-321 L.U.C.B. MEETING: August 14, 2008 DEVELOPMENT NAME: FLEMING S STEAKHOUSE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, Amended

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 208 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA:

ORDINANCE NO. 208 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA: ORDINANCE NO. 208 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 79 (ZONING) TO CREATE A COMMERCIAL HOTEL ZONE AND PERMIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO A COMMERCIAL HOTEL PUD BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

More information

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Hilgers, Planning Director Anna Bertanzetti, Principal Planner Meeting Date Agenda Category Agenda Item # June 23, 2014 Commission Business 4.a 1. Public Hearing

More information

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 6.10 - RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 6.10.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: 6.10.1.1 The regulations established in this Section are intended to provide optional methods of land development

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO APPROVED BY ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BCC Mtg. Date: May 24, 2016 EFFECTIVE DATE June 1, 2016 ORDINANCE NO. 2016-10 AN ORDINANCE AFFECTING THE USE OF LAND IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AMENDING

More information

UPPER DUBLIN TOWNSHIP MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. -J3.7 6

UPPER DUBLIN TOWNSHIP MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. -J3.7 6 UPPER DUBLIN TOWNSHIP MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. -J3.7 6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 255 (ZONING) OF THE UPPER DUBLIN TOWNSHIP CODE OF ORDINANCES TO ALLOW A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AS

More information

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED,

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, ORDINANCE 2087 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER 540, ENTITLED ZONING, OF THE CODE OF THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH

More information

Chapter 10 RD TWO-FAMILY (DUPLEX) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE

Chapter 10 RD TWO-FAMILY (DUPLEX) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE Chapter 10 RD TWO-FAMILY (DUPLEX) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE 10-10-1: DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: 10-10-2: PERMITTED BUILDINGS AND USES: 10-10-3: BUILDINGS AND USES PERMITTED CONDITIONALLY: 10-10-4: BUILDING

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 16- WHEREAS, said Code included Title 12, which is the City s Land Use Ordinance; and

ORDINANCE NO. 16- WHEREAS, said Code included Title 12, which is the City s Land Use Ordinance; and AN ORDINANCE OF THE NORTH LOGAN CITY COUNCIL MODIFYING MISCELLANEOUS REGULATIONS WITHIN THE CITY CENTER ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN CERTAIN CITY CENTER ZONES WHEREAS, the City Council

More information

PERMITTED USES: Within the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District the following uses are permitted:

PERMITTED USES: Within the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District the following uses are permitted: 6.25 MX-1 - MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD 6.25.1 INTENT: The purpose of the MX-1 Mixed Use Neighborhood District is to accommodate the development of a wide-range of residential and compatible non-residential

More information

Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances

Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances Ordinance No. 153 Text Amendment to the Washington County Development Code - Chapter One, Section 2 and Chapter Two, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, of the Development Code

More information

^ARTICLE 57. SAINT VINCENT NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT (^Article inserted on January 27, 1995*)

^ARTICLE 57. SAINT VINCENT NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT (^Article inserted on January 27, 1995*) ^ARTICLE 57 SAINT VINCENT NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT (^Article inserted on January 27, 1995*) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 57-1 Statement of Purpose, Goals and Objectives... 3 57-2 Recognition of the Saint

More information

ARTICLE 909. PD 909. PD 909 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on April 23, (Ord.

ARTICLE 909. PD 909. PD 909 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on April 23, (Ord. ARTICLE 909. PD 909. SEC. 51P-909.101. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. PD 909 was established by Ordinance No. 29330, passed by the Dallas City Council on April 23, 2014. (Ord. SEC. 51P-909.102. PROPERTY LOCATION

More information

320 Maple Mixed Use PDR Narrative Fort Collins, CO Project # 1525

320 Maple Mixed Use PDR Narrative Fort Collins, CO Project # 1525 320 Maple Mixed Use PDR Narrative Fort Collins, CO Project # 1525 July 28, 2015 (a) What are you proposing/use? A 47,00 S.F., 3-story, mixed used project with 30 for-sale condo residential units and 2

More information

Appearance Review Board Staff Report

Appearance Review Board Staff Report Appearance Review Board Staff Report November 15, 2018 ARB2018-10038 Applicant Agenda Item 1 336 N. Orange Ave. Orange & Robinson Apartments Courtesy Review Brooks Stickler Kimley-Horn Owner Carol Brinati,

More information

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION OF LAND REGULATIONS TITLE 17

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION OF LAND REGULATIONS TITLE 17 ARTICLE VI -- GENERAL REGULATIONS AND PROVISIONS Sec. 17-50. Sec. 17-51 General Plan. Sec. 17-52 Lot and Block Design and Configuration. Sec. 17-53 Lot Access. Sec. 17-54 Private Roads. Sec. 17-55 Water

More information

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 SECTION 10.5A10 GENERAL... 1 10.5A11 Purpose and Intent... 1 10.5A12 Applicability... 1 10.5A13 Compliance with Regulating Plan... 1 10.5A14 Relationship

More information

Section 7.01 Area Regulations

Section 7.01 Area Regulations SECTION 7: AREA, YARD AND FENCE REGULATIONS Section 7.01 Area Regulations Except as hereinafter provided, no building or structure or part thereof shall be erected, altered or converted for any use permitted

More information

a. provide for the continuation of collector streets and thoroughfare streets between adjacent subdivisions;

a. provide for the continuation of collector streets and thoroughfare streets between adjacent subdivisions; Section 7.07. Intent The requirements of this Section are intended to provide for the orderly growth of the Town of Holly Springs and its extra-territorial jurisdiction by establishing guidelines for:

More information

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1 50 City of Vancouver Land Use and Development Policies and Guidelines Community Services, 453 W. 12th Ave Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 F 604.873.7344 fax 873.7060 planning@city.vancouver.bc.ca 900 BURRARD STREET

More information

A. Location. A MRD District may be permitted throughout the County provided it meets the standards established herein.

A. Location. A MRD District may be permitted throughout the County provided it meets the standards established herein. 752. Multi-Residential District (MRD) The Multi-Residential (MRD) District is intended to provide opportunities for rural, suburban and urban density mixed-residential developments consistent with the

More information

City and County of Broomfield, Colorado

City and County of Broomfield, Colorado City and County of Broomfield, Colorado CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: From: Mayor and City Council George Di Ciero, City and County Manager Teri Malies, Principal Planner Terrance Ware, Planning Director

More information

b) Tangerine Corridor Overlay District 1) Tangerine Corridor District Regulations

b) Tangerine Corridor Overlay District 1) Tangerine Corridor District Regulations Attachment 1 Tangerine Road Corridor Overlay District Section 27.10.D.3.f.vi.b Initiation of Code Amendment September 2, 2014, Planning and Zoning Commission b) Tangerine Corridor Overlay District 1) Tangerine

More information

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013] [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013] 1.0 General The following policies are applicable to the Montreal Road District as set out in Schedule 1. 1.1 District Objectives The objective of this Plan is to guide

More information

ARTICLE III: LAND USE DISTRICTS 302 R 5 DISTRICT

ARTICLE III: LAND USE DISTRICTS 302 R 5 DISTRICT ARTICLE III: LAND USE DISTRICTS III 7 302 R 5 DISTRICT (RESIDENTIAL 5 UNITS PER ACRE) 302 1 Intent and Purpose The R 5 District is intended to implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for areas

More information

RESOLUTION NO. R RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION NO (A) SPECIAL EXCEPTION PETITION OF BMT REALTY, INC.

RESOLUTION NO. R RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION NO (A) SPECIAL EXCEPTION PETITION OF BMT REALTY, INC. t RESOLUTION NO. R-93-334 RESOLUTION APPROVING ZONING PETITION NO. 73-237(A) SPECIAL EXCEPTION PETITION OF BMT REALTY, INC. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, as the governing body, pursuant to

More information

An Ordinance to provide regulations for private roads and driveways.

An Ordinance to provide regulations for private roads and driveways. 30.0400 PRIVATE ROADS AND DRIVEWAYS TOWNSHIP OF GRAND HAVEN, MICHIGAN ord no. 262 eff. Apr. 27, 1997 An Ordinance to provide regulations for private roads and driveways. 30.0401 Sec. 1 TITLE This Ordinance

More information

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM City and County of Broomfield, Colorado PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Hilgers, Planning Director Anna Bertanzetti, Principal Planner Meeting

More information

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017 Rezoning Petition 2017-041 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: R-5 (single family residential), R-22MF (multifamily residential), and I-1 (light industrial) Proposed Zoning:

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF MARQUETTE, TOWNSHIP OF NEGAUNEE LAND DIVISION, SUBDIVISION AND CONDOMINIUM ORDINANCE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF MARQUETTE, TOWNSHIP OF NEGAUNEE LAND DIVISION, SUBDIVISION AND CONDOMINIUM ORDINANCE STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF MARQUETTE, TOWNSHIP OF NEGAUNEE LAND DIVISION, SUBDIVISION AND CONDOMINIUM ORDINANCE Adopted: August 8 th, 2008 Effective: August 28 th, 2008 Sec.100. Title ARTICLE I GENERAL

More information

ARTICLE 20 SIGNS. SIGN, AREA: The entire area of all sign faces, cumulatively, including sign faces on which no copy is currently displayed.

ARTICLE 20 SIGNS. SIGN, AREA: The entire area of all sign faces, cumulatively, including sign faces on which no copy is currently displayed. ARTICLE 20 SIGNS 7 TCC 1-20 (a) Purpose. The purpose of the article is to provide regulation and control of the location, size, content and placement of signs throughout the County in order to promote

More information

SECTION 821 "R-A" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT

SECTION 821 R-A - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT SECTION 821 "R-A" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT The "R-A" District is intended to provide for the development of single family residential estate homes in a semi-rural environment on

More information

EXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD

EXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD 1 EXHIBIT D Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD Development # 8986.001 Developer: Curtis L. Hart Hart Resources LLC 8051 Tara Lane Jacksonville, Florida

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 13, 2018 Item #: PZ2018-319 STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI Request: Project Name: Development of Community Compact (DCI) and six concurrent

More information

BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1500 HIGHWAY 2, SUITE 208, SANDPOINT, ID 83864 (208) 265-1458 (208) 265-1463 (FAX) planning@bonnercountyid.gov (email) www.bonnercounty.us (web page) INFORMATION SHEET

More information

THE CITY CENTER DISTRICT

THE CITY CENTER DISTRICT THE CITY CENTER DISTRICT v.18 FINAL ADOPTED DRAFT Article 22.24 State Street District Zones Contents: 22-24-1. City Center District (CCD) Zones. 22-24-2. The Hub District (HD) Zones. 22-24-3. Canyon Crossing

More information

PINE RIDGE COMMONS PUD AMEND ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-94

PINE RIDGE COMMONS PUD AMEND ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-94 PINE RIDGE COMMONS PUD AMEND ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-94 Title page of the Planned Unit Development Document, previously attached as Exhibit A to the PUD document of Ordinance Number 99-94, the Pine Ridge commons

More information

Initial Project Review

Initial Project Review Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services, 2401 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA (253) 798-7037 Initial Project Review Major Amendment to Preliminary Plat: Hawks Ridge Division 1 Application

More information

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District Section 1: US 19 Overlay District Section 1.1 Intent and Purpose The purpose of the US Highway 19 Overlay District is to manage access to land development along US Highway 19 in a manner that preserves

More information

PINE RIDGE COMMONS PUD AMEND ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-94

PINE RIDGE COMMONS PUD AMEND ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-94 PINE RIDGE COMMONS PUD AMEND ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-94 Title page of the Planned Unit Development Document, previously attached as Exhibit A to the PUD document of Ordinance Number 99-94, the Pine Ridge commons

More information

SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE INDEX

SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE INDEX SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE INDEX - A - ACCESS Legal access required...16.28.190 Reserve strips for controlling access...16.28.180 Waiver direct street access...16.40.020 ACTION BY LOCAL AGENCY Advisory Agency,

More information

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. 8 Date: 03-07-13 Sonoma, Preliminary Plan, 120130040 Melissa Williams, Senior Planner, Melissa.williams@montgomeryplanning.org,

More information

SECTION 828 "R-3" AND "R-3-A" MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

SECTION 828 R-3 AND R-3-A MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SECTION 828 "R-3" AND "R-3-A" MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The "R-3" AND "R-3-A" Districts are intended to provide for the development of medium density multiple family residential

More information

ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District

ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District SEC. 51P-887.101. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. PD 887 was established by Ordinance No. 29032, passed by the Dallas City Council on June

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 2, 2004 DATE: September 20, 2004 SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Authorizing the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of a Fee Simple Interest

More information

RECOMMENDATION. TO: CITY COUNCIL Date: APRIL 10, 2006

RECOMMENDATION. TO: CITY COUNCIL Date: APRIL 10, 2006 TO: CITY COUNCIL Date: APRIL 10, 2006 FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCIE OF AN EASEMENT DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES ALONG THE GLENARM STREET FRONTAGE OF 1060 SOUTH FAIR OAKS

More information

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis July 16, 2018

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis July 16, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2018-041 Final Staff Analysis July 16, 2018 REQUEST LOCATION Current Zoning: R-5 (single family residential, and UR-2(CD) (urban residential, conditional) Proposed Zoning: UR-2(CD) (urban

More information

This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of low rise multiple family housing.

This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of low rise multiple family housing. PART XXIV - RM-1 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ZONE ONE PART XXIV - RM-1 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ZONE ONE A. INTENT This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of low rise multiple family housing.

More information